Alberta Premier Danielle Smith has announced that her government is looking to introduce a “Dual Practice Surgery Model” allowing doctors to work in both the public and private healthcare sectors simultaneously. The aim is to address long wait times for surgeries by increasing the overall capacity for procedures. This model could extend beyond surgeries to include family doctors, as confirmed by Hospital and Surgical Health Services Minister Matt Jones.
Smith highlighted the significant backlog of over 80,000 Albertans awaiting elective surgeries, such as hip and knee replacements. Under the proposed changes, medical professionals would still be required to meet a quota of publicly funded surgeries annually. However, they would have the option to conduct additional elective surgeries privately during their free time.
The Premier emphasized that this approach would prioritize patients on public waitlists, ensuring they receive timely care. Smith also mentioned that the initiative aims to retain healthcare professionals in Alberta and attract those who may have sought opportunities elsewhere.
The government assures that no Albertans will have to pay for essential healthcare services or visits to their family doctor. Similar dual-model systems are in place in countries like Sweden, Germany, and Australia.
The proposed changes aim to offer flexibility to doctors wishing to engage in both public and private healthcare systems, streamlining the current process. The Canadian Medical Association has raised concerns about potential implications, warning that patients might face prolonged wait times and additional costs.
In response to the speculation, the Alberta Medical Association stressed the importance of evidence-based reforms that involve input from physicians, patients, and stakeholders to safeguard the integrity of the public healthcare system.
While some support the move towards a dual practice model, others express reservations about potential conflicts with the Canada Health Act. Dr. Paul Parks, a former president of the Alberta Medical Association, cautioned that such reforms could undermine the principles of universal healthcare. Experts suggest that legal challenges or adjustments to federal healthcare funding may arise if the reforms are perceived to violate the Canada Health Act.