Albertans are discussing the possibility of a general strike for the first time in over a century, sparked by the provincial government’s use of the notwithstanding clause to end a teachers’ strike. The Alberta Federation of Labour (AFL), consisting of 24 unions representing 175,000 workers, led by President Gil McGowan, is rallying support for potential strike actions.
McGowan, also heading the larger collective Common Front, has vowed to stand against any infringement on workers’ rights. He plans to mobilize workers who are angered by the government’s suspension of bargaining rights to engage in recall campaigns and prepare for a potential general strike.
Regarding the legality of a general strike, the AFL’s proposed action would not meet the requirements set by the Alberta Labour Relations Board for a legal strike or lockout. James Muir, an associate professor of history and law at the University of Alberta, emphasized the importance of distinguishing between legal and illegal strikes based on the protections afforded to workers and the potential consequences.
The repercussions of engaging in an illegal strike can be severe, as evidenced by the experiences of Alberta’s nurses in 1988 when they faced legal actions and significant fines. The Alberta government’s recent use of legislative powers, such as the notwithstanding clause, to end the teachers’ strike underscores the challenges workers may encounter in staging a general strike.
Reflecting on Canada’s history, the Winnipeg General Strike of 1919 serves as a prominent example of the impact of collective action. Despite potential risks, the AFL views a general strike as a means to unify workers and address grievances against the government. While the feasibility and effectiveness of a general strike remain subjects of debate, the AFL is strategically planning its approach to garner support and navigate potential legal and logistical hurdles.